tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4991896898760031.post6074371160835738166..comments2015-03-10T07:00:58.847+00:00Comments on @dhothersall: Coulson diversions: the SpAd and the Child BenefitDuncanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11613809200344761194noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4991896898760031.post-44126596254725938182010-10-06T15:03:21.883+01:002010-10-06T15:03:21.883+01:00DC has said Rupert doesn't sit in the cabinet ...DC has said Rupert doesn't sit in the cabinet - well he not likely to is he? he gives orders he doesn't sit around discussing them with his inferiors.<br /><br />He, probably wielding more power and influence than most, is another non domicile wanting to maintain/increase his share of the cake in UK Ltd by exercising his power over Government.<br /><br />Did David Cameron take on AC because he was incompent at knowing what was going on? Did he take him on because he knew exactly what was going but didn't allow himself to be caught? Or could it be that he, AC, still retains some of those "secret" dossiers mentioned in the "Dispatches" report?<br /><br />There has been a deafening wall of silence surrounding this affair in the media (with one or two notable exceptions) possibly because they all have their "secret" dossiers. <br />But it also appears from the "Dispatches" program that a similar sinister wall of silence pervades many prominent people in society either, because of fear of retribution, or because they have been paid off. <br />What we need is a new Barnes Wallis to blast away at the foundations of these walls - Let us pray that George Galloway and similar minded people are prepared to go to Court and that some evidence remains from the work of the shredders.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4991896898760031.post-49256560813726534392010-10-06T11:57:16.293+01:002010-10-06T11:57:16.293+01:00You are right on the nail here Duncan. No-one is ...You are right on the nail here Duncan. No-one is asking this question - at least not in public. Andrew Grice in the Independent today clarified that Cameron and Osborne hatched this plan without consultation, probably on Monday, but doesn't say why. <br /><br />Yours is the only coherent explanation I have seen. It also explains Osborne's extraordinary silence since his speech - declining to carry the can I suspect, whereas Hague fell on his sword.<br /><br />Trouble is, press cannot do much about it, Oborne's courage in Dispatches notwithstanding. Anyone in the public arena is potentially in Murdoch's cross-hairs. It will need something like a twitter storm by unknowns to make a difference.Sarah Louisehttp://www.pbpositive.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com